<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Pre-Release Testing on Chuanxilu for Skilled Homo sapiens</title><link>https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/tags/pre-release-testing/</link><description>Recent content in Pre-Release Testing on Chuanxilu for Skilled Homo sapiens</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 18:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/tags/pre-release-testing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What a Failed Experiment Got Right</title><link>https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/05/tdd-pipeline-v08-failed-experiment-discovery/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 18:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/05/tdd-pipeline-v08-failed-experiment-discovery/</guid><description>I tried refining the pre-release testing phase of my TDD Pipeline by replacing step-by-step instructions with principles. The refined version failed at its core job. But comparing where it failed against where it unexpectedly succeeded revealed that individual defect diagnosis alone wasn&amp;#39;t enough — it needed a systematic scanning layer on top.</description></item></channel></rss>