<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Intel Mac on Chuanxilu for Skilled Homo sapiens</title><link>https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/tags/intel-mac/</link><description>Recent content in Intel Mac on Chuanxilu for Skilled Homo sapiens</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/tags/intel-mac/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>purr, typeflux, openquack, freeflow: Voice Input Tools Compared on Intel Mac</title><link>https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/07/macos-voice-input-tools-comparison/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/07/macos-voice-input-tools-comparison/</guid><description>An Intel MacBook Pro (MacBookPro16,2) with four open-source voice input candidates: purr, typeflux, openquack, freeflow. Hardware constraints quickly eliminate three. This post documents the comparison, the decision, and what it&amp;#39;s like to use the winner on an Intel Mac.</description></item></channel></rss>