https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/tags/inquiry-protocol/Recent content in Inquiry Protocol on Chuanxilu for Skilled Homo sapiensHugoen-USWed, 06 May 2026 09:00:00 +0800https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/05/inquiry-protocol-design-3/Wed, 06 May 2026 09:00:00 +0800https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/05/inquiry-protocol-design-3/The inquiry protocol's last line of defense: an independent confirmer uses falsifiability testing to hunt for counterexamples, pushing back against AI's shallow anchoring. Plus the protocol's origin story — from 18 bugs of practice to the v0.4.1 upgrade, and plans for reflexivity.https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/05/inquiry-protocol-design-2/Tue, 05 May 2026 17:00:00 +0800https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/05/inquiry-protocol-design-2/Designing termination conditions for an inquiry protocol: T1–T3 are floor conditions (ensure AI goes deep enough), HC1–HC4 are guardrails (prevent the inquiry from spiraling). T2's preventive counterfactual check is the most important insight.https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/05/inquiry-protocol-design-1/Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:00 +0800https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/05/inquiry-protocol-design-1/5-Why handed to AI fails not because the method is outdated, but because AI thinks shallow—stopping early, chasing one thread, seeking only confirming evidence. A real case where all four rounds of attribution went wrong.