<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Falsifiability on Chuanxilu for Skilled Homo sapiens</title><link>https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/tags/falsifiability/</link><description>Recent content in Falsifiability on Chuanxilu for Skilled Homo sapiens</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 09:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/tags/falsifiability/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Last Line of Defense for Inquiry: Independent Confirmation and Protocol Reflexivity</title><link>https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/05/inquiry-protocol-design-3/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 09:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.chuanxilu.net/en/posts/2026/05/inquiry-protocol-design-3/</guid><description>The inquiry protocol&amp;#39;s last line of defense: an independent confirmer uses falsifiability testing to hunt for counterexamples, pushing back against AI&amp;#39;s shallow anchoring. Plus the protocol&amp;#39;s origin story — from 18 bugs of practice to the v0.4.1 upgrade, and plans for reflexivity.</description></item></channel></rss>