Today’s Practice Recall the first question you asked AI today (or recently) — the more casual, the better. Don’t cherry-pick. Ask it again exactly as-is. Save the answer. Now rewrite the same question using the RBGO framework: R (Role): Who should AI play — “senior ops manager”, “strict tech reviewer”, “patient teacher” B (Background): Your specific situation — target users, budget, timeline G (Goal): What you want — a strategy, a troubleshooting approach, an email draft O (Output): What format — 3 recommendations, table format, under 300 words Save the rewritten answer too. Put both side by side. ...

📖 This is Part 2 of 5 in the “AI Path L0→L1 Upgrade Guide” series. Part 1: Understanding Your Tools · Part 2: From Vague Questions to Precise Instructions · Part 3: Turning AI Into Your Collaboration Partner (coming soon) · Part 4: Building Your Personal System (coming soon) · Part 5: Graduation & Next Steps (coming soon) In the last part we covered how LLMs actually work, how their memory operates, and the key differences between major platforms. Starting this week, we move into practice — how to turn what you want to say into instructions that AI can understand precisely. ...

TL;DR: A 4-variable A/B test on Why Articulation — structure, tone, position, and examples. Positive examples made output worse. The model imitated instead of reasoning. Open-ended prompts improved quality directionally and cut tokens by 33%. Series: Why Make AI Articulate Why Before Acting (Article 2) Previous: From Anthropic’s Alignment Research to a Prompt Design Insight Where We Left Off Anthropic’s alignment research [1] landed on a sharp insight: teaching a model why beats telling it what. I took that idea and built Why Articulation into my TDD Pipeline — a mechanism that forces the model to explain its understanding before it writes any code. Early results looked good. ...

Tried ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek… and still can’t decide which one to stick with? Here’s the thing: that’s the wrong question. There is no universally best AI — only the one that fits what you’re doing right now. What’s your scenario? “I want a general-purpose assistant for everything” → ChatGPT. As of May 2026 the default is GPT-5.5 — well-rounded, with the richest plugin ecosystem. If you pick just one, this is a solid choice. ...

TL;DR: Anthropic’s alignment research shows that teaching a model why works better than teaching it what — misalignment dropped from 22% to 3%. This post breaks down four experiments and distills three lessons you can use in prompt design. I ran an A/B test comparing two prompt strategies. One group got positive examples — “do it like this.” The other got no examples. Instead, the AI had to explain why a choice was correct before acting on it. ...

Ever notice your AI suddenly ignoring something you said ten minutes ago? Or opened a fresh chat and had to explain your entire project from scratch? Here’s why. Your AI actually has two kinds of memory, and understanding both changes how you work with it. The Desk: Working Memory Working memory is everything inside your current conversation. Think of it as a desk — limited surface area. A few documents fit comfortably. Stack too many, and older pages slide right off the edge. ...

Last time we covered a foundational idea: LLMs generate probabilistically. They don’t look up answers — they think them through fresh each time. That means response variance is normal, and you need to verify. Easy to understand. Harder to act on. The habit is sticky: open ChatGPT, type a phrase, grab the answer, close the tab. This post isn’t a tutorial. I picked three real scenarios to show what actually changes when you use AI differently. ...

Today’s Challenge Open whatever AI you normally use — ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, anything. Pick an open-ended question. Ask it 3 times. The question is up to you. Some examples: “How do I build a reading habit?” “Python tips for a complete beginner” “How can I run better meetings?” You can rephrase it each time or paste the exact same wording. The key rule: start a fresh conversation each time. Don’t follow up inside the same thread. Three new chats. ...

📖 This is Part 1 of 5 in the “AI Path L0→L1 Upgrade Guide” series. Series navigation will be updated once all parts are published. Introduction: Sound Familiar? I’ve watched a lot of friends use AI tools, and I keep noticing the same pattern. They’re not strangers to ChatGPT or Claude—they use them casually from time to time—but their experience is wildly inconsistent. Sometimes the AI delivers a jaw-dropping answer; other times it completely misses the point, producing something unusable. ...

TL;DR: How does a person grow with AI? This post maps the journey from “opening a chat box for the first time” to “thinking in AI-native ways” across five stages—First Contact, Power User, Engineer, Architect, and Native. The essence of each stage isn’t learning more tools, but a shift in mindset: from passively accepting outputs, to actively designing inputs, to orchestrating multi-agent collaboration, and ultimately reshaping your own cognitive framework. The interactive path map at the end lets you explore each stage in full detail. ...