This is a supplementary part of the AI Path Advanced Guide L2, teaching non-coders how to use AI to write code. L2 has one final step: making AI write code that actually works. How do you make AI write code you can use? Not a demo that runs once. A script you can drop into your project and run. For someone who doesn’t code, the biggest pain points aren’t “how to write code.” They’re three questions: ...
This is Day 14 of the “AI Path: Advanced Upgrade Guide” Week 3 series. Previous post: Day 13 Practice. Project repo: picture-book-pipeline. Introduction In Day 13, I built a skill through six rounds of conversation. A skill is made of role documents, one per role. The agent works from those documents. How you write them directly dictates the quality of the output. A role document has four blocks: identity, input, output requirements, quality requirements. This post goes through each one. What to write, and why. ...
This is Day 13 of the AI Path L1→L2 Upgrade Guide. Before diving in, check out Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, and Day 12 first. Day 12 ended with a promise: in the next practice, we’d run the pipeline by hand. Two tools working in relay. Today, I deliver on that promise. I’m not here to show you how to use an off-the-shelf skill; I’ll show you how to build one from scratch. The project is picture-book-pipeline, which I use to batch-generate children’s picture books. It turns a workflow into a complete skill kit: a SKILL.md overview, role prompts, and execution scripts, all in one directory. ...
This is Day 12 of the AI Path L1→L2 Upgrade Guide. Do Day 8, Day 10 and Day 11 first. Day 11 ended with a crucial question: How do we automate these steps? My approach relies on a simple realization: pairing stateless API calls with an AI agent shares the same core principles as breaking down workflows, designing systems, and building software. I’ve been doing that kind of work for years. The AI picture book project I’m building right now is a clean example. I’ll walk through how I designed its pipeline and tasks. ...
This is Day 11 of the AI Path L1→L2 Upgrade Guide; if you haven’t done so yet, complete Day 8 and Day 10 before diving into this practice session. Day 10 ended with a note: description and verification are two sides of the same coin. If you can’t describe what you want, you can’t check whether you got it. I default to trusting AI output, especially when it sounds confident. The generated text is well-structured, clear, and sounds right. Day 10 mentioned an example: I asked AI to “organize these files by category.” It sorted them alphabetically by name. The result looked organized, but it wasn’t the kind of organization I meant. At the time, I thought, “I need to describe it better next time,” rather than asking, “Did it actually deliver what I requested?” ...
This is Day 10 of the AI Path L1→L2 Upgrade Guide. You should complete Day 8 and Day 9 first. I learned this the hard way. “I thought I was being clear” is a lie I’ve told myself too many times while writing AI prompts. I once asked an AI to organize project documents: “Help me sort these files.” What I got back: all .md and .py files mixed together, sorted alphabetically by filename. It did sort them, just not the way I meant. Another time I said: “Show me the directory structure.” I wanted a tree view. The AI gave me ls -lh output: file sizes, timestamps, permissions, everything I didn’t ask for. The root cause wasn’t model capability. It was prompt specification. Refining your task description can mean the difference between three back-and-forth prompt iterations and getting it right on the first turn. Here are three exercises from everyday scenarios. Each starts with a vague version, breaks down what’s missing, and builds up to a clear version. If you read these and think “wait, I write prompts like the vague version too,” that is exactly why this article exists. ...
This is a bonus article for the “AI Path L1→L2 Upgrade Guide.” If you haven’t set up Codex yet, this guide gets you from zero to running. On July 9, 2026, OpenAI made two announcements at once: GPT-5.6 went public, and Codex was merged into the ChatGPT desktop app. The new desktop app has three modes: Chat, Work, and Codex, all in one app. If you already have the standalone Codex desktop app, it updates in place. Your projects and settings carry over. ...
This is a bonus article for the “AI Path L1→L2 Upgrade Guide.” If you have not installed OpenCode yet, this guide gets you from zero to running. On Day 8, you learned about autonomous execution AI. The next step is actually installing and configuring OpenCode. OpenCode is an open-source AI coding assistant. It is free, supports multiple models, and has a skill system. Paired with OpenCode Zen, OpenCode allows you to use tested models without setting up third-party API keys, including the free DeepSeek V4 Flash. ...
This is Day 9 of Week 2 in the “AI Path L1→L2 Upgrade Guide.” You should have completed Day 7 Exercise: Add Error Handling to Your Script first. Day 7 added error handling to your script, so it’s resilient now. But there’s a bigger cost factor you might have missed: the API provider you picked could cost a lot more than you think. DeepSeek V4-Pro charges $0.435 per million input tokens. OpenAI GPT-5.5 charges $5.00. That’s roughly an 11.5x difference. Factor in caching and the gap widens further. ...
This is Day 8 of Week 2 in the “AI Path L1→L2 Upgrade Guide.” You should have completed Day 7 first. On Day 7, you added error handling to your script. It now runs reliably in real network conditions. But there’s a more fundamental limitation: you still have to write code. Writing code to call APIs is one kind of automation. There’s a lighter one: describe the task, and let AI write the code, run it, and fix the bugs itself. That’s autonomous execution AI. ...